Friday, May 22, 2009

I'll wait



In addition to communicating with the local Air Traffic Control facility, all aircraft in the Persian Gulf AOR are required to give the Iranian Air Defense Radar (military) a ten minute 'heads up' if they will be transiting Iranian airspace.

This is a common procedure for commercial aircraft and involves giving them your call sign, transponder code, type aircraft, and points of origin and destination.

I just flew with a guy who overheard this conversation on the VHF Guard (emergency) frequency 121.5 MHz while flying from Europe to Dubai . It's too good not to pass along.


The conversation went something like this...


"Iranian Air Defense Radar: 'Unknown aircraft you are in Iranian airspace. Identify yourself.'


Aircraft: 'This is a United States aircraft. I am in Iraqi airspace.'


Air Defense Radar: 'You are in Iranian airspace. If you do not depart our airspace we will launch interceptor aircraft!'


Aircraft: 'This is a United States Marine Corps FA-18 fighter. Send 'em up, I'll wait!'


Air Defense Radar: (no response ... total silence)

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Irreverent Stress relieving Humor

Subject: STRESS MANAGEMENT

Just in case you’re having a rough day, here is a stress management technique recommended in all the latest psychological journals. The funny thing is that it really does work and will make you smile.

1. Picture yourself lying on your belly on a warm roc k that hangs out over a crystal clear stream.

2. Picture yourself with both your hands dangling in the cool running water.

3. Birds are sweetly singing in the cool mountain air.

4. No one knows your secret place.

5. You are in total seclusion from that hectic place called the world.

6. The soothing sound of a gentle waterfall fills the air with a cascade of serenity.

7. The water is so crystal clear that you can easily make out the face of the person you are holding underwater.

There!! See? It really does work. You're smiling already.

Thanks Vicy!

www.walterdavidson.com

Saturday, April 25, 2009

The Basics of Internet Home Business Success

The Basics of Internet Home Business Success

Phase One

Without Paying Customers, there is no Cash Flow aka Profit !

You need motivated Buying Customers, not Clicks from random passers by who do not want your wares or services.

For Our websites to prosper you and I first need to understand the World Wide Web and how it works.

You should first understand the Nomenclature (

–noun

1. a set or system of names or terms, as those used in a particular science or art, by an individual or community, etc.

2. the names or terms comprising a set or system.

Origin:
1600–10; <>

nomenclator
, -ure

),

a term I first heard while in the Military.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Internet- –noun

a vast computer network linking smaller computer networks worldwide (usually prec. by the). The Internet includes commercial, educational, governmental, and other networks, all of which use the same set of communications protocols.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The World Wide Web- –noun

Is a system of extensively interlinked hypertext documents: a branch of the Internet. Abbreviation: WWW

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Web Site- –noun

In computers- a connected group of pages on the World Wide Web regarded as a single entity, usually maintained by one person or organization and devoted to a single topic or several closely related topics.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Search Engine- –noun

a computer program that searches documents, esp. on the World Wide Web, for a specified word or words and provides a list of documents in which they are found.

( example: Google Search, etc..........)

A software program that searches a database and gathers and reports information that contains or is related to specified terms.

A website whose primary function is providing a search engine for gathering and reporting information available on the Internet or a portion of the Internet.

Web sites or software that search the Internet for documents that contain a key word, phrase, or subject

that is specified by the user ( potential Customer ) to the search engine. Each engine has its own method of searching for information ( YOUR SITE ! ).

A remotely accessible program that lets you do

keyword searches for information on the Internet. There are several types of search engine; the search may cover titles of documents, URLs, headers, or the full text

.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Uniform Resource Locator (URL)- noun

In

computing, a Uniform Resource Locator (URL) is a type of Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) that specifies where an identified resource is available and the mechanism for retrieving it.[1] In popular usage and in many technical documents and verbal discussions it is often, imprecisely and confusingly, used as a synonym for uniform resource identifier. The confusion in usage stems from historically different interpretations of the semantics of the terms involved.[2]

In popular language, a URL is also referred to as a Web address.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Full Text-

In

text retrieval, full text search refers to a technique for searching a computer-stored document or database. In a full text search, the search engine examines all of the words in every stored document as it tries to match search words supplied by the user. Full-text searching techniques became common in online bibliographic databases in the 1970s[verification needed]. Most Web sites and application programs (such as word processing software) provide full text search capabilities. Some Web search engines, such as AltaVista employ full text search techniques, while others index only a portion of the Web pages examined by its indexing system.[1]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Indexing-

When dealing with a small number of documents it is possible for the full-text search engine to directly scan the contents of the documents with each

query
, a strategy called serial scanning. This is what some rudimentary tools, such as grep

, do when searching.

However, when the number of documents to search is potentially large or the quantity of search queries to perform is substantial the problem of full text search is often divided into two tasks: indexing and searching. The indexing stage will scan the text of all the documents and build a list of search terms, often called an

index, but more correctly named a concordance

. In the search stage, when performing a specific query, only the index is referenced rather than the text of the original documents.

The indexer will make an entry in the index for each term or word found in a document and possibly its relative position within the document. Usually the indexer will ignore

stop words, such as the English "the", which are both too common and carry too little meaning to be useful for searching. Some indexers also employ language-specific stemming

on the words being indexed, so for example any of the words "drives", "drove", or "driven" will be recorded in the index under a single concept word "drive".

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The precision vs. recall tradeoff-

Due to the ambiguities of

natural language, a full text search typically produces a retrieval list that has low precision: most of the items retrieved are irrelevant. Controlled-vocabulary searching solves this problem by tagging

the documents in such a way that the ambiguities are eliminated. However, a controlled vocabulary search may have low recall: it may fail to retrieve some documents that are actually relevant to the search question. Despite the presence of many irrelevant documents in a free text search's retrieval list, a free text search may be able to locate a document that a controlled vocabulary search failed to retrieve.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The false positive problem-

Free text searching is likely to retrieve many documents that are not

relevant to the intended search question. Such documents are called false positives. The retrieval of irrelevant documents is often caused by the inherent ambiguity of natural language

.

Certain clustering techniques based on

Bayesian algorithms (similar to spam filter in gmail[citation needed

]) can help reduce the false positive errors. So if the search term is "football", these techniques can categorize the document/data universe into say "American football", "corporate football" etc. Depending on the occurrences of words in a document, it can fall into one of the categories or more. These techniques are being extensively deployed in the e-discovery domain.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Improving the performance of full text searching-

The deficiencies of free text searching have been addressed in two ways: By providing users with tools that enable them to express their search questions more precisely, and by developing new search algorithms that improve retrieval precision.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Improved querying tools-

Keywords

. Document creators (or trained indexers) are asked to supply a list of words that describe the subject of the text, including synonyms of words that describe this subject. Keywords improve recall, particularly if the keyword list includes a search word that is not in the document text.

Field-restricted search. Some search engines enable users to limit free text searches to a particular field within a stored data record

, such as "Title" or "Author."

Boolean queries. Searches that use Boolean operators (for example, "encyclopedia" AND "online" NOT "Encarta") can dramatically increase the precision of a free text search. The AND operator says, in effect, "Do not retrieve any document unless it contains both of these terms." The NOT operator says, in effect, "Do not retrieve any document that contains this word." If the retrieval list retrieves too few documents, the OR operator can be used to increase recall; consider, for example, "encyclopedia" AND "online" OR "Internet" NOT "Encarta". This search will retrieve documents about online encyclopedias that use the term "Internet" instead of "online." This increase in precision is very commonly counter-productive since it usually comes with a dramatic loss of recall. [2]

Phrase search

. A phrase search matches only those documents that contain a specified phrase, such as "Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia."

Concordance search. A concordance search produces an alphabetical list of all principal words that occur in a text

with their immediate context.

Proximity search

. A phrase search matches only those documents that contain two or more words that are separated by a specified number of words; a search for "Wikipedia" WITHIN2 "free" would retrieve only those documents in which the words "Wikipedia" and "free" occur within two words of each other.

Regular expression. A regular expression employs a complex but powerful querying syntax

that can be used to specify retrieval conditions with precision.

Wildcard search. A search that substitutes one or more characters in a search query for a wildcard character such as an asterisk. For example, in the search function in Microsoft Word

, using the asterisk in the search query "s*n" will find "sin", "son", "sun", etc. in a text.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Improved search algorithms-

Technological advances have greatly improved the performance of free text searching. For example, Google's

PageRank algorithm gives more prominence to documents to which other Web pages have linked. This algorithm dramatically improves users' perception of search precision, a fact that explains its popularity among Internet users. See search engine

for additional examples.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Text retrieval software-

The following is a partial list of available software products whose predominant purpose is to perform full text indexing and searching. Some of these are accompanied with detailed descriptions of their theory of operation or internal algorithms, which can provide additional insight into how full text search may be accomplished.

Attivio

Autonomy Corporation

Brainware

Dieselpoint

Endeca

Fast Search & Transfer

ht://Dig

Inktomi

Lemur/Indri

Lucene

Ferret

Minion

mnoGoSearch

Sphinx

Swish-e

VivĂ­simo

Xapian

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notes-

1. In practice, it may be difficult to determine how a given search engine works. The

search algorithms actually employed by Web search services are seldom fully disclosed out of fear that Web entrepreneurs will use search engine optimization

techniques to improve their prominence in retrieval lists.

2. Studies have repeatedly shown that most users do not understand the negative impacts of boolean queries.

[1]

See also:

Controlled vocabulary

Information retrieval

Search engine

Search engine indexing

- how search engines generate indices to support full text searching

Subject Indexing

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Full_text_search"

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Keyword- noun

1. a word that serves as a key, as to the meaning of another word, a sentence, passage, or the like: Search the database for the keyword "Ireland."

2. a word used to encipher or decipher a cryptogram, as a pattern for a transposition procedure or the basis for a complex substitution.

3. Also called

catchword.

Library Science. a significant or memorable word or term in the title, abstract, or text of an item being indexed, used as the index entry.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ad Word-

PPC program where webmasters can create their own ads and choose keywords. ... Your ad appears beside relevant search results. ... When people search on Google using one of your keywords, your ad may appear next to the search results. Now you're advertising to an audience that's already interested in you.

======================================================

When we as Internet Merchants and Service Providers create a Web Site, it does us NO good for the site to be listed on Page 5000. No One will go there.

People often misspelll words. If you include these Misssplellledd words on your site, when Search Engines search the World Wid Web, if youur misspelled wword is the subject of that search and your's is one of the few SITES with the misspelled word, then you might be on page 1 of that search. Additionally, The person conducting the Search is specifically looking for a site like yours. Try misspelling words and searching for them and see what comes up.

Armed with this knowlege, understand that I have not touuched on everything nessecary to encourage and aid buying customers to your site. This is the beginning..........,

GET A GOOD WEB MASTER INVOLVED !

I am not an Internet Speciallist and depend on these information providers for Technical Assistance. Please visit the Reference Sites Listed below, as they provided the Definitions above.

Thanks to:

http://en.wikipedia.org/

http://www.ask.com/

http://dictionary.reference.com/

for providing these Nomenclature.

Cordially,

www.walterdavidson.com

wizardry@netdoor.com

601-331-1769

http://wwwdotwalterdavidsondotcom.blogspot.com/

http://currentaffairsvoiceyouropinion.blogspot.com/

Internet Home Business Preditors

To whom it may concern:

Success !?????!

These remarks are Scathing and Harsh. Do not read this if you are easily offended.

I think frightening People with reminders of how tough the Economy and Job Situations are in order to sell an Internet Home Business; is DESPICABLE.

Just explain Your Sales Pitch without all the Drama(!) but be Ethical !

Using these terror tactics to motivate Potential Internet Home Business Owners, to buy into an Internet Home Business, at a time of extreme suffering/unemployment; and then being vague about the process necessary to sell the product to Customers ( Not nessesarily Yourself ) and earn make a Profit, as Your Upline does ( you are technically in the Red Ink NOT, in the Black Ink ), is DESPICABLE.

Then, after paying a " JOINING FEE "; telling Potential Internet Home Business Owners, that they will have to pay even MORE MONEY, to operate a website ( with Advertising COSTS in the 100s to thousands of dollars a year ), ( I have had Successful Yearly Internet Advertising Budgets of $250.00 annually ); so, if all the money is still COMMING OUT of POCKET, with no noticeable CASH FLOW/PROFIT; that is also DESPICABLE !.

Then, when the Internet Home Business Predators tell you that the U S Gov. requires you to be your own customer and, that you must buy the product to participate and/or pay a monthly fee(!); that is DESPICABLE.

We are in business to sell our prooducts ! Using the Product does NOT produce Profit !

Lastly, after TAKING YOUR MONEY, they remind you; that they didn't promise you'd make ANY MONEY, in THEIR FINE PRINT ( ! ), that is DESPICABLE.

While there are no guarentees in business, You are still out the money to Start.

No Banker lends a new Business Owner a Startup Loan, unless the Borrower has proven their Potential to be succcessfull in that business, and has a decent detailed Business Plan !

Read the Legalese carefully !

If you have participated in these organizations and failed because the " Leader/Upline fails to show you how to sell the product AS SUCCESSFULLY AS THEY HAVE; yet push you to BUY THE PRODUCT MONTHLY AND/OR PAY A MONTHLY FEE, while signing up new Associates/Buyers to replicate what you are doing, with little success; well, an unnrelated bunch of disreputable charactors in Columbia do business the same way. The higher ups however, never use their product or pay monthly fees.

Disclaimer: There is only 1 organization I am currently involved with which has these practices. They know who they are, and how they operate.

Yes, it does cost money to run a Home Business ( Internet or otherwise ) however, YOU do NOT have to be a CUSTOMER or PAY a Monthly Fee, to be successfull in a Home Business, Internet or otherwise ! Do your research and due diligence !

Every Home based business is not like this. I do business with some of THE GOOD GUYS !

I have also run a successfull Internet Businesses in my career. I know it can be done ! Do NOT loose HOPE or become Discouraged.

BEWARE the PREDATORS! Do your research and due diligence before joining !

See DISCLAIMER BELOW !!!!!

Humbly presented to you by,

www.walterdavidson.com

wizardry@netdoor.com

601-331-1769

http://wwwdotwalterdavidsondotcom.blogspot.com/

http://currentaffairsvoiceyouropinion.blogspot.com/

Disclaimer: No Specific Internet Home Business was Named in this Opinion.

Thursday, April 23, 2009

What If........


Hello,


Forgive me if I am long winded, or provide you with information you already have.


What IF


What IF; a group of Patriots spent eight years trying to hammer out an accord ( perhaps The Constitution of the United States of America ) which would allow their thirteen communities ( Colonies? ) to be SOVEREIGN ( having supreme rank, power, or authority,, supreme, preeminent, indisputable, a sovereign right ) within said community.

What IF; they wanted to run their own communities internally, without interference from the other communities/central government and, live together in Freedom, Peace and Mutual Prosperity?

What IF; every community that later joined enjoyed the same FRUITS and BENEFITS of that accord?

What if; their idea was to form a central meeting place, not an interfering Central Domineering Government ( Dictatorship? ), where differences between the thirteen communities could be peacefully worked out.

What IF; that Central Body ( Federal Government ) was not allowed to interfere with the internal business of the individual thirteen sovereign commmunities, per the accord?

What IF; all this happened, after a devistating War for Independence from a Monarchy, read Dictator; a civil split between those who wanted ( Patriots ) this new opportunity and those who didn't ( Torries, Monarchists/Dictators ).

What IF; you compound this with Brush Wars of personal feuds ( like the Hatfields and McCoys etc. ) and Border Wars, over Tariffs between their thirteen sovereign communities.

What IF; there was an ever present threat from established Empires, who covet the abondant recources of the thirteen sovereign communitie's land, and the populace's potential use as Subjects, read Serfs or Slaves.

What IF; the representatives of the thirteen sovereign communities, drafted and voted UNANIMOUSLY 100 percent ( NOT 51 percent or better ) for a document ( The United States Constitution for example ).

What IF; all elected officials and Government Soldiers had to take an Oath to Support and Defend The Constitution of The United States of America against all enemies Foreign and Domestic for example. By the way, They DO ! ! ! !

What IF; We survived for 200 Years, and pushed the World forward in Social, Scientific, Economic, Political, Standard of Living and Technological quantum leaps, faster than any other Civilization or Society in the written history of Man on Earth !

What IF; these Quantum Leaps were made possible by the Lack of suppressive Monarchists, Dictators, Totalitarians, War Lords etc.......................................................

What IF; some one or an finite group of someone's ( read dictators ) wanted to run the lives of the Majority by circumventing the United States Constitution, and little by little taking away our Freedoms? Ask me about Frog Soup sometime!

What IF; everyone suddenly realized that Race, Sex and any other discrimination you care to name do not change the Fact that All of Us, We the People, regardless of our differences, are All equal and Citizens of the United States of America. As Benjamin Franklin once told the Continental Congress before presenting King George of England with The Declaration of Indepenence; " We must now hang together, or We shall certainly All Hang Separately from a tree ". What the Continental Congress did was Treason to the Crown of England until They won Their FREEDOM, then They became HEROS and PATRIOTS ! You should be both !

What IF; a few Dictators wanted to USURP ( verb (used with object) to seize and hold (a position, office, power, etc.) by force or without legal right ) United States Sovereignty by allowing Foreign Law to be enforced USURPING United States SOVEREIGN AUTHORITY within it's Borders?

What IF; you had to Support and Defend The Constitution of The United States of America against all ENEMIES Foreign and Domestic, TODAY , would you?

What IF; We the People of the United States of America, had the same responsibility to Support and Defend The Constitution of The United States of America against all ENEMIES Foreign and Domestic TODAY ? Well by virtue of Membership in the United States of America via your Legal Citizenship and Legal Residence in your State, YOU DO HAVE THAT INESCAPABLE RESPONSIBILITY !

Be PATRIOTIC ( ! ) and Support and Defend The Constitution of The United States of America against all ENEMIES FOREIGN and DOMESTIC, TODAY ! Do NOT suffer the actions of those ( DICTATORS ) who would take away your FREEDOM !


Thank You for your time and Attention,


www.walterdavidson.com


wizardry@netdoor.com


601-331-1769

















Monday, April 20, 2009

Services I Provide

Hi,

A little bit about me...............................................->

I have the privalege of having been the C E O of Davidson and Associates for over 30 Years.

Davidson and Associates provides Goods and Services from www.walterdavidson.com .

Services include, but are not limited to:

- Private / Civil / Corporate / Criminal and Domestic Investigations

- General Purpose Guards

- Executive and Domestic Body Guards

- Backround Investigations

- Surveillance and Counter Surveillance

- Electronic Audio and Visual Security Consultations / Installations

- Counter Electronic Surveillance Sweeps

- Problem Solving

- Finding lost Items / People

- Weapons Training and Self Defence
( I will not ask you to do anything I've not done myself; be prepared because this takes time, patience and dedication )

- Survival in Hostile Environments Training

- Executive and Personal Protection Training

- Personal Everyday Living, Security Training

- Surviving in Foreign Lands Training

- and more........................................

- Soon you will be able to go to my website www.walterdavidson.com and view my Credentials

- No 2 assignments are alike, so there is no menu.

-Pricing is based on the requirements of the Case.

-Cases are NOT discussed over the phone, nor are prices quoted over the phone.

-Consultations are by appointment only, in person, with an applied Retainer.

-Thank You for Your time and consideration.

-This agency makes no Promises or Guarentees

-My ISP www.netdoor,com , is currently sorting through and installing on my site www.walterdavidson.com , my resume and credentials. Please feel free to check every so often, and when the Docs are posted, read the documents posted at www.walterdavidson.com .

Friday, April 17, 2009

Saying No

Saying No

Saturday, March 28, 2009 at 5:31pm

10 Ways to Say No, Guilt-Free

Nothing spreads you thinner than trying to please everyone. Here’s how to let yourself off the hook in 10 common scenarios

By Amanda Hinnant.

Thinking you are a bad person for saying no is a symptom of "the disease to please." "Saying yes when you need to say no causes burnout. You do yourself and the person making the request a disservice by saying yes all of the time," says author Duke Robinson. Here's how to do the right thing -- for yourself and others -- in 10 common scenarios where you know that opting out is your best option. Don't feel guilty. Just take these tips from experts on etiquette and communication -- and a cue from your favorite two-year-old -- and say no.

Saying No for the Sake of Your Wallet

Request: A friend in need asks for a Trump-worthy loan. What you should say: "I wish I could, but as a rule, I don't lend money to friends." Why it works: It's clear that you are not singling out this person as untrustworthy. Why you shouldn't feel guilty: Lending any amount of money can cause problems, says communications trainer Don Gabor. "It can change the nature of your relationship if the person doesn't pay you back." How to avoid the situation in the future: Never lend money to friends and you won't get a reputation as a walking, breathing ATM.

Request: A coworker wants you to chip in $25 for a gift for a colleague you wouldn't recognize at the watercooler. What you should say: "Oh, I've never really had a conversation with Sam. I think I'll just wish him a happy birthday in person." Why it works: Chances are, the person taking donations has no idea how close you are (or are not) with the intended recipient. By clarifying the nature of your relationship -- and emphasizing your intention to get to know the person better -- you come across as thoughtful rather than cheap. Why you shouldn't feel guilty: "A gift isn't a gift if it's an obligation," say etiquette writers Kim Izzo and Ceri Marsh. How to avoid the situation in the future: If workplace gift giving is getting out of hand, take the lead in restoring sanity by circulating a card before someone can break out the gift-donation plate. Make sure others know you don't expect anything on your birthday.

Request: Your third cousin asks to bring her boyfriend-of-the-month to your $150-a-plate wedding reception. What you should say: "We've already had to make so many tough decisions to get the guest list down to size. We really can't squeeze in/afford another guest. But I would love to have you two over for drinks sometime so I can meet him." Why it works: If you illuminate some of your behind-the-scenes planning, your cousin may get a clue about the inappropriateness of the request. Why you shouldn't feel guilty: It's your party and your pocketbook, says author Patti Breitman. How to avoid the situation in the future: Make a few calls before you put together the guest list to see if there are new additions you should consider as you plan.Saying No for the Sake of Your Time

Request: You are offered a promotion that you don't want. Even though it means more money, it demands more hours and more of what your boss calls responsibility and you call tedium. What you should say: "I'm flattered that you want me, but for personal reasons I'm not in a situation where I can take this on. Perhaps in a year from now things will be different. Can we talk again if my circumstances change?" Why it works: If you're caught in this enviable dilemma, your boss will understand you have personal priorities that take precedence. Why you shouldn't feel guilty: By saying no to more time at the office, you're saying yes to other things you cherish, be they long walks alone at sunset or evening time with your children. How to avoid the situation in the future: "If a position opens up at your workplace, you could let it be known that you are not in the running," Breitman suggests. Being forthright saves your manager the trouble of pursuing a candidate who isn't interested.

Request: You are asked to coordinate the bake sale -- again -- at your child's school. What you should say: "I know I'm going to disappoint you, but I've decided not to volunteer this year, because I fear I'll end up feeling resentful. Is there any way to get some of the other parents to step up?" Why it works: Often people feel manipulated into doing something ("The ice cream social just won't happen without your help!"). If you can address the problematic pattern of one person's doing all the work, you sidestep the manipulation. And if you say no, it might force others (who never get asked) to say yes. Why you shouldn't feel guilty: "You've done your fair share, and now others can do this job," says Robinson. How to avoid the situation in the future: "Encourage school leaders to present the problem to all the parents," says Robinson. "If people know an important program may fail, they'll usually remedy the situation."

Request: You're invited to a distant relative's annual Lobster Luau -- for the 14th year in a row. What you should say: "I've really had fun in the past, but I can't make it this year. That week is already packed for me." Why it works: "You've explained it in a way that doesn't sound like a personal rejection," says Robinson. "And you've asked for understanding, based on your need to take stress out of your schedule. Everyone can identify with that." Why you shouldn't feel guilty: You have only so much free time -- and so much tolerance for flying lobster goo. "Don't R.S.V.P. yes, then back out at the last minute or, worse, not show up at all," say Izzo and Marsh. "That is the least decorous way of handling the invite." How to avoid the situation in the future: In a note, thank the relative for thinking of you and explain that because you tend to be busy at this time of year, he should feel free to take you off his invite list.

Request: Your boss asks you to supervise this season's intern -- last seen with her feet up on a desk, iPod on, Gameboy in hand. What you should say: "Wow, that's an interesting project. I'm really busy with the ABC assignment right now, so let me know if you want me to re-prioritize." Why it works: "Asking your boss to prioritize tasks for you means you don't have to actually say the no word," Breitman says. If she tells you to just squeeze the new task in, then do it. But keep a list of all the extra work you've done -- for your next review. Why you shouldn't feel guilty: You really do have enough work to do as it is. How to avoid the situation in the future: If extra tasks keep getting dumped on your desk, ask your boss for a meeting. Explain that the added assignments are making it hard to do your primary job properly. Ask if she wants to review your job description (and renegotiate your salary while she's at it). No for the Sake of Your Sanity.

Request: A friend asks to borrow your car (because hers is in the shop to repair the dent she got while driving, talking on her cell phone, and unwrapping her kid's juice-box straw). What you should say: "I don't lend anything worth more than $1,000." Try to avoid the old "I don't have insurance for a non-family member" excuse -- most insurance policies cover the car, not specific drivers. (If your friend got into an accident, it could make your premium go up, though.) If you have time, offer her a ride instead. Why it works: "It puts the blame on you," explains author Patti Breitman. "Just don't indicate you don't trust the friend." Why you shouldn't feel guilty: "Your car is probably the first or second most valuable thing you own," says Breitman. "You're protecting a big financial asset." Plus, if your friend were to get into an accident, your relationship might be totaled, too. How to avoid the situation in the future: Let your friends know that while you're typically a generous lender ("Of course you can borrow my snorkeling gear!"), your car is off-limits.

Request: A guest offers to bring her seven-layer dip to your party. It doesn't really go with the Greek theme you have planned. What you should say: "What a kind offer -- thank you. I have already planned the menu, but do you have any dietary restrictions I should know about?" If she's just asking to be nice and insists on bringing something, suggest a bottle of wine or a loaf of bread. Why it works: By acknowledging the generosity of the offer, you let that person know she did all she could. Of course, if the person has dietary restrictions that make cooking difficult for you, relent and let her bring a dish she can eat. Why you shouldn't feel guilty: The person is most likely offering just to be courteous. By saying no, you give her license to relax and enjoy your hospitality. How to avoid the situation in the future: When you invite people, ask if there is anything they don't eat, because you want to make sure your menu works for everyone. Emphasize the word menu, so people know that you have a plan or a theme for the meal (and so they won't try to upset it).

Request: Your future sister-in-law wants to throw you a shower, but you don't want the fuss. What you should say: "I really don't want a party, but thank you so much for offering. Why don't we splurge on a visit to a day spa instead?" Why it works: "Not everyone likes a party in her honor or wants to be the center of attention with a paper plate of bows on her head," say etiquette writers Kim Izzo and Ceri Marsh. Unless she has her own agenda, she should understand. Why you shouldn't feel guilty: "If you decline, you are taking away some pleasure from the people who care about you, but it is your occasion to shout about or be quiet about," say Izzo and Marsh. How to avoid the situation in the future: Announce what you would prefer to do instead of a shower before anyone offers to throw one.

Best wishes on your success!

The 10 Rules of Weight Loss

The 10 Rules of Weight Loss

Yesterday at 7:58pm

by Runner's World

Nancy ClarkNutritionist

Nancy Clark shares 10 tips all runners should know if they want to drop some pounds.

1. To lose 10 pounds of body fat a year, you need to eat 100 calories less per day. Cutting too many calories from your daily intake will sap your energy level and increase your hunger, making you more susceptible to splurging on high-calorie foods.

2. Don't skip breakfast. Eat within two hours of waking.

3. In fact, eat more breakfast than you think you should. Trade in some of your dinner calories for more calories at breakfast.

4. Don't allow yourself to get hungry. Eat at least every four hours, and split a meal in half to make sure you properly fuel up pre- and postrun. For example, eat part of your breakfast before your morning run (a banana) and the rest of your breakfast afterward (a bagel with peanut butter).

5. Eat at least three kinds of food each meal from these four categories: breads, cereals, and grains; fruits and vegetables; low-fat dairy and soy; and lean meats, fish, and nuts. Breads, cereals, and grains should be the foundation of each meal, with protein as an accompaniment.

6. Shoot for a gradual loss of body fat. You're more likely to put the weight back on (and more) if you drop weight too quickly.

7. Liquid calories add up fast and can lead to weight gain. Minimize the amount of sodas, juices, store-bought smoothies, sports drinks, coffee drinks, and alcohol you consume.

8. Eat closer to the earth, enjoying fruits, vegetables, and whole grains. Minimize the amount of processed foods you eat; they tend to offer less fiber and are less satiating.

9. If you can't resist fast food, ask for nutritional information before you make your choices (or check in advance via restaurant Web sites). Avoid any menu items with the words "fried," "crispy," and "special sauce," which are guaranteed to be high calorie.

10. Remember that the calories in the energy bars, sports drinks, and gels you consume during a run add up, even though you're running. Consume them only as needed.
Dear Blogger Team,

After Editing this blog I did find my Phone number below. Let me know if it's ok.

Thank You

www.walterdavidson.com

wizardry@netdoor.com

Spelling

I cannot spell nor do I Edit/ write/ or Type well

www.walterdavidson.com

wizardry@netdoor.com

Signature

April 18th, 2009

Dear Google Blogger Team

Yes, I do sign my personal E-Mails, Posts and all other written communications thusly:

Thank You,

or Cordially,

www.walterdavidson.com

wizardry@netdoor.com

( and usually my phone number since I could not find a place in the profile for it I left it off this Post. )

Is this Blog a spam? NO

April 18th, 2009

Re: Blocked Blog

Dear Google Blogger Team,

I deeply appreciate the Security! I am not attempting to Spam anyone.

The views expressed here are Mine. I read the posts of others of like mind, and acknowlege their work in each post, with the exception of annonymous who was just that.

I have opinions which may not be the same as others, or the readers may indeed be of like mind. I have no intention of being blatantly offencive to anyone. I do wish to express myself as the Constitution guarentees.

If it was personal details, please explain.

I am not a Lawyer. And I did read the terms. I fervently hope it was just a robot glitch.

If I am in genuine violation of the Terms, Please provide this novice with a detailed explanation so I can edit the mistake.

I like this Blog portion of Google and I look forward to a long and interesting Blogging experience.

Other than this response, I have transfered the current Posts from my notes on my Facebook page Walter Clifton Davidson, check out my notes.

I hope this was satifactory response, as this is my first blog. Help me write it correctly, please.

Cordially,

www.walterdavidson.com

wizardry@netdoor.com

The Founder's circumstances and intents

The Founder's circumstances and intents



Saturday, March 7, 2009 at 8:13pm

This is some excerpts from a book written by Robert H. Boatman... The framers of the Constitution were under no pressure from the NRA when they wrote "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."In the same spare sentence, they reaffirmed their historical preference for a "militia" over a standing army, and indicated that this militia should be composed of armed citizens -- citizens of a "free state" whose right to keep and bear arms must never be infringed. Anti-freedom zealots, including academic invalids and the hypocrites of the mis-named American Civil Liberties Union, have stood on their pointy heads in tortured attempts to misinterpret this sentence ever since. Those of us who know how to read the English language have no trouble at all....Unfortunately for the English people, they have been persuaded by their own far-left government and insidious anti-gun activists to allow the English Bill of Rights to be, as they might say, shat upon. Today, the English do not have the right to keep and bear arms for self-preservation and defense. As a direct result, they live in a crime-ridden society that grows worse with each passing day. The recent 2000 International Crime Victims Survey published by the Dutch Ministry of Justice, a highly respected and accurate measurement of the percentage of people by nation who are victims of violent crimes, ranked England far ahead of the United States (which ranked 8th), and second only to Australia (where English-style anti-gun laws are also in effect) as the most violent nation. A recently disarmed England now has twice as much violent crime as the United States. The English Home Office, which cooperated in the survey, has refused to publish these findings in England. It's better not to remind the gullible subjects how empty were the promises of safety and security for which they so eagerly traded away their very real and priceless freedoms and responsibilities. The great Roman philosopher and senator, Cicero, immortalized armed self-defense as an "inalienable right" more than 2,000 years before the U.S. Constitution did so. Cicero said: There exists a law, not written down anywhere but inborn in our hearts; a law which comes to us not by training or custom or reading but by derivation and absorption and adoption from nature itself; a law which has come to us not from theory but from practice, not by instruction but by natural intuition. I refer to the law which lays it down that, if our lives are endangered by plots or violence or armed robbers or enemies, any and every method of protecting ourselves is morally right.In 1987, a year after Glocks were introduced to the U.S., Florida enacted a pioneering "shall-issue" right-to-carry law that has served as the model for the rest of the country. The Florida law affirmed the right of a private citizen to carry a concealed gun and eliminated the abuses so typical of "discretionary" right-to-carry laws that resulted in gun permits being awarded arbitrarily to the political cronies of petty officials, limousine liberals, movie actors, athletes and various other celebrity representatives of the rich and famous crowd, but denied to so-called "ordinary" citizens. The Florida law made it crystal clear that any citizen with basic firearms training and a felony-free record would be issued a concealed-carry permit upon request, period.Florida's landmark right-to-carry law was supported by the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, Florida Sheriffs Association, Florida Police Chiefs Association and other law enforcement groups. And it was supported by Florida voters.The media, however, was predictably vociferous in its opposition to the exercise of Constitutionally guaranteed rights, and in its total submission to the party line of radical anti-freedom, anti-self-defense and anti-gun forces. Headlines predicted vigilante justice and wild-west shootouts on every corner. "Florida will become the "Gunshine State." "A pistol-packing citizenry will mean itchier trigger fingers." "Florida's climate of smoldering fear will flash like napalm when every stranger totes a piece." "Every mental snap in traffic could lead to the crack of gunfire."Such dire and colorful predictions, of course, proved totally false. Nevertheless, that same hysterical fear-mongering and bald-faced lying are used even today every time a new state gets ready to pass an enlightened right-to-carry law. In actual fact, the only notable thing that happened for the first five years after Florida passed its right-to-carry law was that, as homicide rates in the U.S. soared, Florida's homicide rate fell a dramatic 23 percent. A few of the opponents of concealed carry actually had the courage to admit they were wrong.Notwithstanding the fact that most people do not carry guns, the mere possibility that an intended victim could be armed with a handgun eliminates millions of crimes every year. According to the FBI, states with "shall-issue" right-to-carry laws have a 26 percent lower total violent crime rate, a 20 percent lower homicide rate, a 39 percent lower robbery rate and a 22 percent lower aggravated assault rate than those states that do not allow their citizens to legally carry guns. Professor of Criminology and Criminal Justice at Florida State University, Gary Kleck, in Point Blank: Guns and Violence in America (Aldine de Gruyter Publishers, 1991) found that "robbery and assault victims who used a gun to resist were less likely to be attacked or to suffer an injury than those who used any other methods of self-protection or those who did not resist at all." Convicted felons reveal in surveys that they are more afraid of armed citizens than they are of the police. And well they should be. Armed citizens kill 2,000 to 3,000 criminals each year, three times the number killed by the police. And only two percent of civilian shootings involve an innocent person mistakenly identified as a criminal, whereas the error rate for the police is more than five times that high.Kleck's research shows that private citizens use firearms to protect themselves and thwart crime about 2.5 million times a year. Citizens use firearms to prevent mass killings, bank robberies, gang attacks, carjackings, rapes, kidnappings and hostage-takings. They use them to help capture prison escapees and murderers, to come to the aid of outnumbered or ambushed law enforcement officers. Yet only a handful of these 2.5 million life-saving uses of firearms are ever reported in the mainstream press.If a lot more people carried guns, what kind of a society would we have? Certainly not the kind predicted by anti-gun fanatics. Those hysterical doomsayers have been proven absolutely wrong one hundred percent of the time. Would we have a crime-free society? Certainly not. Criminals are as natural and immune to total eradication as fruit flies. But a better-armed society would severely limit the violent damage criminals wreak before they are stopped. Criminals are naturally self-destructive. The reasons they are so doesn't matter. To assist them in their self-destructiveness is the polite and civilized thing to do. Thus another ageless axiom: An Armed Society Is A Polite Society.Go to: http://usconcealedcarry.org/

What would you do?

What would you do?

Saturday, March 21, 2009 at 4:29pm

What would you do if armed terrorists broke into your church and starting attacking your friends with automatic weapons in the middle of a worship service? Would you be prepared to defend yourself and other innocents? Would you be justified in doing so? Is it time for Americans to consider such once-unthinkable possibilities? There is one man in the world who can address these questions with first-hand experience. His name is Charl van Wyck – a South African who was faced with just such a shocking scenario. In "Shooting Back: The Right and Duty of Self-Defense," van Wyk makes a biblical, Christian case for individuals arming themselves with guns, and does so more persuasively than perhaps any other author because he found himself in a church attacked by terrorists. "Grenades were exploding in flashes of light. Pews shattered under the blasts, sending splinters flying through the air," he recalls of the July 25, 1993, St. James Church Massacre. "An automatic assault rifle was being fired and was fast ripping the pews -- and whoever, whatever was in its trajectory -- to pieces. We were being attacked!" But van Wyk was not defenseless that day. Had he been unarmed like the other congregants, the slaughter would have been much worse. "Instinctively, I knelt down behind the bench in front of me and pulled out my .38 special snub-nosed revolver, which I always carried with me," he writes in "Shooting Back," a book published for the first time in America by WND Books. "I would have felt undressed without it. Many people could not understand why I would carry a firearm into a church service, but I argued that this was a particularly dangerous time in South Africa." During that Sunday evening service, the terrorists, wielding AK-47s and grenades, killed 11 and wounded 58. But the fact that one man – van Wyk – fired back, wounding one of the attackers and driving the others away. Those killed that day were: • Guy Cooper Javens • Richard Oliver O'Kill • Gerhard Dennis Harker • Wesley Alfonso Harker • Denise Gordon • Mirtle Joan Smith • Marita Ackerman • Andrey Kayl • Karamjin Oleg • Varaksa Velentin • Pavel Valuet The last four were Russian seamen attending the service as part of a church outreach program. Another Russian seaman, Dmitri Makogon, lost both legs and an arm in the attack.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Do YOU really have to suffer before YOU WAKE UP and bring ballance to Your Community? An informed, trained, free and armed Populace is a Polite and Safer Community. This isn't a gun matter, it is a Survival Matter. Let Freedom Ring!
TADA! TING TING TING

Thank You!

I have improved my website www.walterdavidson.com .
Please check out My 2009 Cold Steel Knife Catelog and Retail Price List.>

www.walterdavidson.com

wizardry@netdoor.com

601-331-1769

Thank You www.netdoor.com for maintaining my site !

An unnamed citizen sent this to his congressman

An unnamed citizen sent this to his congressman

A LETTER TO MY SENATOR

Dear Sir, We are sending this info on what we know is right for us the american individual and family, (1) We are dead set against allowing you to give OUR social security to illegal aliens. (2) We are dead set against allowing you to give OUR right to bear arms away !! (3) We are dead set against allowing you to give away OUR hard earned tax money to private companies ! ! (4) We are dead set against allowing you to give away OUR tax monies to foreign people when we americans need it. (5) We are dead set against allowing you to give away OUR motto on our money "IN GOD WE TRUST". (6)We are dead set against allowing you to give away OUR right to freedom of speech ! (7) We are dead set against allowing you to give away OUR rights to an individual and family period ! we are not the population,WE are a INDIVIDUAL only... (8) We are dead set against allowing you to give away OUR right to pursue happiness ! (9) We are against allowing sitting judges to make laws ! (10) We against allowing our congress to pass laws that are against our constitution,this is OUR constitution ! (11) We want and will pursue strict term limits on all politicians,from city to state to federal period. (12) We want and will pursue strict enforcement of our laws on the books now with no more added. (13) We are dead set against allowing you to give away OUR sovernity as a country. (14) We are dead set against allowing you to give away OUR constitution and our gold standard in order to destroy our dollar. (15)We are dead set against allowing you to give away OUR COUNTRY to the UN PERIOD ! ! We are a country of LAWS not men,we are individuals and not the generalized population as you have said. We will and get our country back off this track of being called groups,I can't stress enough that we are and always will be a country of individuals period SINCERELY Tags: letter, senator, to